Keep Scrolling Down

Keep Scrolling Down

By Charles Peek

For Edna McGrew and Lillian Ogden, my high school librarians 

I wrote last month about my pencil collection and the lessons that collecting and mounting it taught me, and the blog set several of you to recalling your own collections, your own lessons.  Thanks for your replies to the blog and by email and Facebook.

Pencil and paper are fast becoming outmoded technologies.  They are comparatively cheap to buy, as any browse down the correct aisle in Office Depot will demonstrate. But they are incredibly expensive to teach someone to use…tens of thousands of dollars and that doesn’t even include the lessons in cursive any more…who needs it?

In contrast, by the time they are in 3rd or 4th grade, your child or grandchild can make presentations in Power Point to their classes, working on a computer connected to the internet that cost a few hundred dollars.  Economics are one of the sure signs of obsolescence.

These same forces have an effect on another collection of sorts, the sort of collection we call a library.  Writer Bias Alert: I love libraries! I served for years on my local library board, I’m a card-carrying library patron, and I’ve sent several students off to study library science.  I’m in my first year of a three-year term on the Nebraska Library Commission.

My love of libraries, however, began in my own pre-history, the murky and unremembered days from which there is little recall.  Greeley, Colorado. What seemed a gigantic book case, a row of colorful books, and finally spotting the Freddie the Pig mysteries, which I was reading well before I started school.  Sometime 60 years later, I had taken a group of future teachers on a school visit and we had assembled for a talk by the Principal in the school library.  I glanced over at the nearest shelf and staring back at me from a dust jacket: Freddie the Pig.  As the class followed the Principal on a tour, I stayed behind to read the detective story again—Freddie was a sleuth and he’d found me again! The children coming in and out were curious but tolerant of their intruder.

I wonder if only-children are more attracted to libraries?  Wherever we were, the local library was like a second home to me.  I don’t recall ever going to a children’s summer reading program, though I might well have.  But I do recall the Evanston, Illinois, library showing movies and seeing Clifton Webb in Cheaper by the Dozen there.

When my dad took his first parish out of seminary in Salida, Colorado, I was delighted to find we lived directly across the street from the Carnegie Library.  These were the old libraries, with a long flight of steps up to the front doors and the checkout desk the first thing you saw when you came in. Book case after book case in long straight rows and a wooden case with small pull-out drawers, each drawer labeled with a code.  It was Dewey Decimal then and for years of my early life until the trauma of the change-over to Library of Congress.  By the ‘60’s I knew that much needed to be changed—but this? The Dewey Decimal System?  What harm had it ever done anybody?  I am probably still not quite over the trauma.

As we were about to leave Evanston, I had my tonsils removed (a woman doctor, at tat, name Dr. Pope), and in the wake of being relatively healthy for the first time in years, I put on about fifty pounds before entering the next grade.  In Salida, McCray Elementary was just off the corner of our lot, so I’d walk home, come through the back gate in the wood fence, eat the hard-boiled egg my mother had decided was better for me than milk and cookies, and trundle myself off to the library.  “Go see what books you’d like to check out,” Mom would call after me. Once, coming back almost too late for dinner, my folks asked me what took me so long. I told them I couldn’t very well know what books to bring home until I’d read them!

When I graduated high school, two amazing things took place that changed my life forever.  One was, fearful of the hellish Freshman English program I had heard I would encounter at the University of Nebraska, I enrolled for my Freshman English at McCook Junior College in a class taught by C. F. Wright.  My previous writing was pretty much the province of journalism and speech classes, so Wright was really my first real writing instructor.  He taught me how to use a library for research and I still have the paper I wrote for him Summer 1960—a paper on the origins of jazz (another story for a later blog).

Fast-forward years later: I’ve been teaching in the University’s Freshman English program and we are in a bull-session where its fine director, Ned Hedges, is telling us some of how it came about and how it had changed over the years.  Along the way, he mentioned its former reputation as what poet Lucille Clifton later called in Memphis a sort of “Death Valley.”  The only Freshman course harder than ours, he said, was the one old Charlie Wright used to teach at McCook Junior College!  I was able to bear witness!

The other occurrence came from a conviction I felt strongly as I graduated high school that I was, on the great scale of things, as ignorant as a stump.  Maybe this came from comparing myself to educated people.  My parents were both educated and readers, my grandparents as well, and then many (of course, not near all) of my teachers showed signs of literacy.  But none of them were warning me that I was woefully behind. Nevertheless, something did warn me, and I heeded the warning.

The same summer I took Wright’s class, I went to the local library.  It was a Carnegie Library then (his portrait adorned one of the walls), but we referred to it as “Millicent Slabey’s Library” in honor of is librarian for 20 year just retired when we moved to town. Subsequent librarians would say that their terms were just years on loan from Ms. Slabey.  The Library has been moved now for many years, is called the McCook Public Library, and the former library is part of McCook’s High Plains Historical Museum.

There, I looked up the only name I really could pull out of the hat—John Steinbeck.  I read every Steinbeck book the library had to offer.  Any contributions I might have made to any intellectual conversations my freshman year were fairly limited to what I could dredge up from The Grapes of Wrath, Of Mice and Men, or even The Short Reign of Pippin IV!

I repeated that the following summer. Back from college and working for the State Highway Department on road crews, I checked out all our library’s holdings of Ernest Hemingway.  A couple of philosophy classes, however, taught me that just possibly binge reading was not the most productive way to conduct a reading career. The only binge reading I did after that was one long weekend when I realized I’d forgotten to read War and Peace when it was assigned in Lee Lemon’s class.  But my choice of classes from then on was pretty much determined by what lay ahead on my reading list.

In other words, my life of reading and writing (and, holy smokes, getting paid to do it) began in libraries.  I spent hours in the stacks at UNL’s Love Library while I was writing my dissertation in a field almost unknown to me (another story for another time) or reading Medieval Italian (a grammar and dictionary in hand for a language I did not know) for Paul Olson’s Spenser seminar.  Then came library tours with my students at NAU (where the college president referred to it as “libary” but then he and his wife also claimed not be “a reading family”) and again at UNK, and the pleasure of being able to update the library’s holdings in fields in which I was supposed to be, in Steve Martin’s words, a man who knew a thing or two about a thing or two.

Several of the UNK librarians were and are our personal friends and one, Colleen Lewis, is a Deacon at our parish church. I was honored to serve on my local library board when the late Ron Norman was our fine librarian, and always delight in seeing Christine Walsh when I’m in the KPL for a Senior College class.  She’s a great help to my role on the Library Commission.

The digital age has changed libraries.  I am not a partisan of either side—it is what it is.  The libraries I grew up in did not have to be hospitality centers for homeless and transient populations, but I’m overjoyed when I see many of them not confine themselves to the lobbies and restrooms but find a nook inside and read or teach themselves English. And all in all, the physical labor of librarians has greatly reduced from the first libraries with their cumbersome tablets and scrolls.  Those technologies, however, are still embedded in our language…you may well be reading this on a “tablet” and you’ve managed to “scroll down” at least this far before deciding this may all be a shaggy dog story.

Nebraska’s libraries, incidentally, are among the best in the nation.  I can say this because, being new to the Commission, I had nothing to do with that. There are nation-wide rating systems, however, and the number of our “star” libraries ranks up there with those of the states with the biggest populations, and despite my presence on it, we have a top-drawer Library Commission, mostly because we have a top-drawer Director named Rod Wagner and very fine regional directors, including my region’s Denise Harders.

Two of our newer libraries, Alliance and Beatrice in opposite ends of the state are also architectural delights, in each of which my old college brother, Gary Bowen, had a hand.

Legislators, hard-pressed for budget dollars, might well consider how the services of their local or school library benefits so many of their constituents of all ages.  Or, in the face of all the tough problems legislators face daily, they might look up and think: our libraries never give me any problem—in fact, they help me solve a lot of them!  At least it was once assumed that literacy itself was a vital element in a healthy Republic.

If you are in our neighborhood and haven’t seen it yet, stop by UNL’s Love Library and see their new “learning commons.”  It is spectacular and has multiplied exponentially the number of students using the library.  (Thanks, Jeanetta Drueke!)

Kearney, Nebraska

March 31, 2017

 

Chuck Peek’s award winning poetry has been published in several journals, as well as in his chapbooks, Where We’ve Managed Somehow to Be (Wayne State College Press, 2014) and Breezes on Their Way to Being Winds (Finishing Line Press, 2015). Breezes was selected for Talking Books and won the 2016 Nebraska Book Award for Poetry. Another poem appeared in the March 6, 2017, issue of Ted Kooser’s “This American Life in Poetry.” Parson’s Porch recently published a book of Chuck’s sermons preached in Grace Church (Episcopal), Red Cloud, over two decades during Cather events: Speaking Aloud at Grace Church. He is currently working on his first book of fiction. Professor Emeritus at the University of Nebraska Kearney, Fulbright Scholar (China 2005, 2008), and winner of Nebraska Center for the Book’s Mildred Bennett Award for fostering the literary arts, Peek has made invited presentations on Faulkner and Cather, both nationally and internationally, as well as keeping up his interests in Hemingway and the Harlem Renaissance. With Robert Hamblin, he co-edited A William Faulkner Encyclopedia (now available in Chinese and Japanese as well as English) and edited A Critical Companion to Faulkner Studies, directed Kate Benzel’s Heartland Emmy Award winning program “Prayers for the People: Carl Sandburg’s Poetry and Songs,” and continues to teach for Senior College of Central Nebraska, UNL’s OLLI, the Bishop Kemper School for Ministry, and the Faulkner and Yoknapatawpha Conference, as well as serving on the Willa Cather Foundation Board.  Chuck and his wife Nancy divide their time between Kearney, Nebraska, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. They are both active in the Bold Alliance and Kearney Action Network.

Alice in Wonderland and the Tea Party-“curiouser and curiouser”

Alice in Wonderland and the Tea Party – “curiouser and curiouser”

By Charles Peek

The local version of the national pro-Trump/Pence rallies called for last Saturday was a pathetic little affair, which appears to have been true most places.  Here, two lone supporters with a large American flag and a Trump-Pence sign stood at the town crossroads.  We watched them as we ate across the street.  They would have been alone except for a large white pickup with a Trump-Pence sign that brandished the Confederate Flag that drove by giving them a toot on the horn, I suppose in support.  Two weeks earlier at CPAC, their counterparts sported Russian flags.

“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands” … but these folks can’t seem to figure out just which flag, just which Republic.

My Facebook post about this drew one comment, “controversial,” and another, “strident.” My grandfather fought for the Union (reminder: that means the United States of America) against the Confederacy and I’ve had loads of friends who fought in wars in which Russia was one of the antagonists, and you go brandishing the Confederate and Russian flags and then suggest I’m being controversial or strident!

I’ve noticed recently that these supporters are same ‘T for Tea now T for Trump’ party advocates who regularly refer to our country as a “cesspool.”  This, the later refinement on swamp??? One you pump, one you drain? Until you find whatever lies at the bottom and elevate it to the cabinet?

Breitbart did its job in creating fake news or distorting news with some factual basis into a portrait of our country gone to the dogs, in dire crisis, greatly in need of the savior who will make us great again. It is the same old garbage dished out by the Fascists in Germany and Italy.  To oppose it is to be “enemy of the people.”  Unless you’ve reread Darkness at Noon lately, it may be some time since you’ve heard that phase.  It was a favorite of the Communists in Russia, of Lenin and Stalin.  Steve Bannon (Trump’s henchman, or is it the other way around) has described himself as a Leninist, which is to say a nihilist.

Maybe better re-reading: Dostoyevsky! Or read anything that doesn’t rely on these crypto-Fascist lies!

Still, the little Trump-Pence Two-Party seemed pathetic in its turn out.  I’ve read that in Washington, they mustered 200 people.  In another city, about 75.  Compare those big-city numbers to the 200 in our town who showed up for the Light the Way rally in support of refugees and immigrants, or the 75 at the protest at Senator Fischer’s local office over her support of DeVos.  Close to that number for the meetings of the new Kearney Action Network, or for Kearney Indivisible, not mention lots of groups of varying sizes including Suit Up Nebraska.

That Light the Way rally elicited at least one of the usual Tea Party form letters as a Letter to the Editor criticizing the rally and its organizers. The letter made me think how, over the years, I’ve noticed that ideology produces a rote form.  I first noticed this when we heard our fourth or fifth student guide in China tell us about China and its dynasties and dreams…almost verbatim the same lyrics to the same song.  These were perfectly bright students, very keen in conversations about my lecture topics, people whom for the most part we enjoyed…but who became rote speakers on Party-pilot when the matter turned to something touched by ideology. You may have noticed that Tea Party diatribes always sound pretty much the same.

This particular letter had the usual phrase lifted from the constitution out of context and with no reference to history. They really like carrying the Constitution in their pocket a lot more than upholding the Constitution in the Supreme Court!

Then came the mantra: contrary to the rally’s false assumptions, the truth (as known by the letter writer) was “plain to see”: refugees and immigrants were “plainly and simply” one thing only: illegal aliens.  All that ideological jargon means is that all meaningful distinctions are blurred in favor of the one ideological idea.  That was exactly why at one time in our country 1/8 drop of “colored” blood made one “plainly and simply” a Negro.  In this “plain to see” world, no difference between the immigrant who takes lives and the immigrant who saves lives can be admitted…because, all that is important is that, plainly and simply, the immigrant is “illegal,” “alien,” and unwanted.

The hallmark of this “plain to see” mentality is ignorance.  There were, under previous presidents (Bush, Obama) distinctions and these allowed for priorities and policies.  Trump (and before him the Tea Party) abolished the distinctions but still like to talk about having priorities.  We are not out to get everyone…we have priorities. Such as the woman taken from where she awaited emergency surgery?  Such as the immigrant with a traffic violation? Such as the father taking his children to school? Well, mistakes will be made when cleaning out the cesspool.

The worst feature of the Letter to the Editor, this one and its form template, however, was that the writer professed to those who disagreed, “I don’t hate you, just disagree with you.”  The full impact of that is gained if you read it with proper pitying tone: “I pity you for the ignorance that can’t see things plainly and simply the way I do.  You, too, should probably not be voting.  Maybe we can fix that in the next voter purge. But I don’t hate you.”

This, of course, is all preface to the justifying claim that the issue is illegality, that we welcome immigrants as long as they are legal. And what is pernicious about that is, plainly and simply, that they don’t.  After all, why shouldn’t they hate the “illegals”? Their leader has called them “rapists” and “murderers”—what’s not to hate? (Other than that immigrants commit felonies at about half the rate American citizens do!)

But the fact is, they don’t welcome anyone at all who is different from them. They despise a global world in which they have to compete with people they regard as inferior. They (or the surrogates they countenance) can in fact regularly be heard at the bar or coffee shop (or, now, the Congress) ridiculing ethnic groups, people of different sexual orientation, women, minorities, and people with differing religious beliefs. “Towel heads.”  “Those Muslims with their asses in the air.” “She persisted.”  These among the printable comments.

And it doesn’t stop with talk. It issues in treating those “others” with menacing threats and gestures, with bullying them, with dragging them behind the pickup, the one whose owner loves the swastika and the way of life for which it stands.

‘T for Tea Party now for Trump’ means the dogs are off the leash, everyone they despise is in danger, and why in the world two people were waving an American flag in support of that I could not say. Would that my conservative ancestors were here to show them what real conservatism and real patriotism look like. *

* For facts about immigrants in the US see:
Here’s the Reality About Illegal Immigrants in the United States by VIVIAN YEE, KENAN DAVIS and JUGAL K. PATEL MARCH 6, 2017 New York Times

 

Kearney, Nebraska

March 6, 2017